I have a Musgrave rifle mounted in a laminated stock (not sure of exact make). The stock is starting to look a bit knocked about and has started soaking up water a bit on particularly wet range days. I'd like to re-varnish it to generally tidy it up and reseal it.
Is this something I could comfortably attempt myself or something that should be left to an expert?
What sort of varnish should be used and how should I go about preparing the stock?
Thanks,
Charlie.
Re-varnishing Stock
Moderator: dromia
-
- Full-Bore UK Supporter
- Posts: 776
- Joined: Mon Dec 06, 2010 1:28 pm
- Home club or Range: Cornwall RC @ Millpool; Duchy Shooting Assn @ Zelah
- Location: Cornwall
Re: Re-varnishing Stock
I had a laminated stocked TR that was looking a bit sad so I took to it with sandpaper and wire wool and lots of time!
I finished it with, I think, 5 coats of Tru Oil and the end result was very acceptable. Careful not to round sharp edges.
Good luck
JohnG :cornwall:
I finished it with, I think, 5 coats of Tru Oil and the end result was very acceptable. Careful not to round sharp edges.
Good luck
JohnG :cornwall:
Re: Re-varnishing Stock
I have used laminated stocks for many years and they need to be completely sealed against water ingress or there is a risk that de-lamination may occur.
Therefore I don't think that traditional stock oil finishes are suitable. I would use a two-part clear cold cure lacquer such as Rustins Plastic Coating.
SD
Therefore I don't think that traditional stock oil finishes are suitable. I would use a two-part clear cold cure lacquer such as Rustins Plastic Coating.
SD
- ovenpaa
- Posts: 24689
- Joined: Fri Nov 05, 2010 8:27 pm
- Location: Årbjerg, Morsø DK
- Contact:
Re: Re-varnishing Stock
I would be inclined to go with a two pack coating which will seal it fully but be warned, some such coatings do yellow with age.
Re: Re-varnishing Stock
Thanks for all the replies - that's certainly given me some avenues to look into. I'll try and get some decent pics of the stock later which might inform which method is most appropriate.