6.5 Creedmoor Load Development

This section is for reloading and ammunition only, all loads found in here are used strictly at your own risk, if in doubt ask again.
All handloading data posted on Full-Bore UK from 23/2/2021 must reference the published pressure tested data it was sourced from, posts without such verification will be removed.
Any existing data without such a reference should treated as suspect and not used.

Moderator: dromia

Forum rules
All handloading data posted on Full-Bore UK from 23/2/2021 must reference the published pressure tested data it was sourced from, posts without such verification will be removed.
Any existing data without such a reference should be treated as suspect and not used.

Use reloading information posted here at your own risk. This forum (http://www.full-bore.co.uk) is not responsible for any property damage or personal injury as a consequence of using reloading data posted here, the information is individual members findings and observations only. Always verify the load data and be absolutely sure your firearm can handle the load, especially older ones. If in doubt start low and work your way up.
Message
Author
User avatar
mag41uk
Posts: 1844
Joined: Sat Oct 13, 2012 3:50 pm
Home club or Range: Aldershot R & P Club
Location: Reading
Contact:

Re: 6.5 Creedmoor Load Development

#11 Post by mag41uk »

My opinion would be to ditch QL and stick with Viht`s tried and tested published data.
I reload 260rem which is not dissimilar to your 6.5 - it`s its father!
I used N160 but have moved onto N555.
Either of these will get you another 100fps safely.
Whether you need the velocity is another matter - I shoot to 1200yds so for me its a factor.
If you are only going to 600 then the N150 will be fine. (I use N150 in another 260 rifle - 20 inch barrel - with 108 scenars and its superb at 600).
I would start 2gns down from max with any of these powders but be aware of varying case capacities between makes.
If you are not familiar with ladder testing then have a google.
BLZeebub

Re: 6.5 Creedmoor Load Development

#12 Post by BLZeebub »

mag41uk wrote: Mon Jan 31, 2022 12:44 pm My opinion would be to ditch QL and stick with Viht`s tried and tested published data.
I reload 260rem which is not dissimilar to your 6.5 - it`s its father!
I used N160 but have moved onto N555.
Either of these will get you another 100fps safely.
Whether you need the velocity is another matter - I shoot to 1200yds so for me its a factor.
If you are only going to 600 then the N150 will be fine. (I use N150 in another 260 rifle - 20 inch barrel - with 108 scenars and its superb at 600).
I would start 2gns down from max with any of these powders but be aware of varying case capacities between makes.
If you are not familiar with ladder testing then have a google.
Good to know - Vihts numbers do seem to be conservative with N150 so a move to N160 looks like a better option as it has done well for some in the same club. It's a shame the N555 same out just after i got the 150 and 160 at the start of lockdown!
A ladder test is on the cards for this week.
I've done a capacity check on both the Hornady and S&B so have a good idea of how much room there is.
The plan is to go to 1000+ if possible so any extra fps will help.

Cheers
Nat
B-)
User avatar
phaedra1106
Posts: 3428
Joined: Wed Feb 08, 2012 9:37 pm
Location: Just outside Sacriston (the nice bit!)
Contact:

Re: 6.5 Creedmoor Load Development

#13 Post by phaedra1106 »

Another of my club members shoots a Tac A1 using N160, 42gr and a 139 Scenar. I tried the load in mine (and the Bergara.)

No improvement in group size over N150 only a 17% increase in powder usage for the same results troutslapping

Needless to say I've gone back to N150 :good:
There's room for all Gods creatures, next to the mash and gravy :)
User avatar
dromia
Site Admin
Posts: 20219
Joined: Sat Nov 06, 2010 4:57 am
Home club or Range: The Highlands of Scotland. Cycling Proficiency 1964. Felton & District rifle club. Teesdale Pistol and Rifle club.
Location: Sutherland and Co Durham
Contact:

Re: 6.5 Creedmoor Load Development

#14 Post by dromia »

phaedra1106 wrote: Thu Feb 03, 2022 9:07 am using N160, 42gr and a 139 Scenar.
His data source?
Image

Come on Bambi get some

Imperial Good Metric Bad
Analogue Good Digital Bad

Fecking stones

Real farmers don't need subsidies

Cow's farts matter!

For fine firearms and requisites visit

http://www.pukkabundhooks.com/
User avatar
Sim G
Posts: 10748
Joined: Sat Nov 06, 2010 9:09 pm
Contact:

Re: 6.5 Creedmoor Load Development

#15 Post by Sim G »

No one should ever use QuickLoad as a single source of data. It’s lured so many people into doing so. It’s a theoretical programme. Even QL themselves state that any formula must be cross referenced with published data of the manufactures.
In 1978 I was told by my grand dad that the secret to rifle accuracy is, a quality bullet, fired down a quality barrel..... How has that changed?

Guns dont kill people. Dads with pretty Daughters do...!
User avatar
phaedra1106
Posts: 3428
Joined: Wed Feb 08, 2012 9:37 pm
Location: Just outside Sacriston (the nice bit!)
Contact:

Re: 6.5 Creedmoor Load Development

#16 Post by phaedra1106 »

dromia wrote: Thu Feb 03, 2022 9:12 am His data source?
Current Viht load data,

https://www.vihtavuori.com/reloading-da ... rtridge=95
There's room for all Gods creatures, next to the mash and gravy :)
Post Reply

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: Bing [Bot] and 3 guests