F class target dimension for the Imperial

News from the National Rifle Association (UK)

Moderator: dromia

Forum rules
Please note that the NRA section has been locked until further notice.
Message
Author
HeatherW762

Re: F class target dimension for the Imperial

#11 Post by HeatherW762 »

Have you got the old & new round the wrong way or is my headache worse than I thought? Weren't the short range targets getting slightly bigger not smaller? :G

Heather
User avatar
ovenpaa
Posts: 24689
Joined: Fri Nov 05, 2010 8:27 pm
Location: Årbjerg, Morsø DK
Contact:

Re: F class target dimension for the Imperial

#12 Post by ovenpaa »

I remember Mik saying the new Short range F Class were going to be smaller for last year. Are they getting bigger again?
/d

Du lytter aldrig til de ord jeg siger. Du ser mig kun for det tøj jeg har paa ...

Shed Journal
John25

Re: F class target dimension for the Imperial

#13 Post by John25 »

I just made a pdf out of the exel spreadsheet which Mik sent me.

To quote him in an earlier email

"The 4,3,and 2 rings have been made bigger for all the (word omitted) shooters"

For any word omitted - think manure ;)

Are the 'old' one on the list the 'old,old' ie before 2010, I haven't got a bible here to check?
User avatar
Quarters
Posts: 197
Joined: Tue Dec 13, 2011 4:04 pm
Contact:

Re: F class target dimension for the Imperial

#14 Post by Quarters »

Hi,
Thanks for all your responses.
desparado

Re: F class target dimension for the Imperial

#15 Post by desparado »

"The 4,3,and 2 rings have been made bigger for all the (word omitted) shooters"


Mik is correct.
The 4,3 & 2 rings were made too narrow last year and have now been corrected.
The 2012 Bisley Bible now shows the correct dimensions - see the post by 'Ovenpaa'.

Cheers,
Locked

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 2 guests