The UK's Finest Independent Forum for Shooters and Gun Owners. Est 2010.

I had a glock before the ban and I loved its rugged simplicity , also I loved its safety , don't point it at things and pull the trigger if you don't want to shoot them !

ordnance wrote:

DaveB wrote:Breacher,

Never said there was anything necessarily wrong with the Glock - I just don't like them. My absolute first choices are steel-framed pistols, preferably ones which can be carried cocked and locked.

I doubt the army would allow you to carry cocked and locked.

You are correct, but in my experience once you cross the start line (or line of departure as our American cousins like to call it) oversight of some of the less useful rules becomes difficult. The Americans always had a regulation that said the 1911A1 had to be carried with the hammer down on an empty chamber. I am sure most obeyed the regulation in the rear areas, but few, I would suspect, continued the practice once they left the security of the unit lines. I like having the option, even if the powers-that-be wouldn't want me to use it.

tackb wrote:I had a glock before the ban and I loved its rugged simplicity , also I loved its safety , don't point it at things and pull the trigger if you don't want to shoot them !

Agreed...

My Glock 21 was the ultimate pistol IMHO.

Other peoples mileage may of course vary

Apologies for my unnecessary photo, couldn't resist

My Glock 21, 1996. by David Nimrod, on Flickr