Re: Covid 19 vaccinations for all over 50 from September
Posted: Wed Jul 27, 2022 8:37 pm
Is that the one, where at some point, there's a shot at a flat earther holding forth against a horizon that is clearly curved?
All people seeking membership must contact admin after registering to be validated.
https://mail.full-bore.co.uk/
Is that the one, where at some point, there's a shot at a flat earther holding forth against a horizon that is clearly curved?
Oxford/Astra, Moderna and Pfizer.
No, its not.... it is being celebrated (well some of them) as being an mRNA vaccine which is a relatively "new" technology. "New" in this instance refers to the fact that it was first approved for use in the 90s. It was discovered in the 60s and has been rigorously tested for decades. The first full scale trial of mRNA vaccines was completed in 2015 as a replacement for the current flu jab. No one (except maybe the media and conspiracy nuts) is suggesting that this is a brand new and untested technology because that just isn't true.Blackstuff wrote: ↑Wed Jul 27, 2022 7:14 am The CV19 jab was, and still is touted as being brought about in an ENTIRELY new way
As above, the first human trial finished in 2015. 7 years ago. Consider yourself proven wrong.Blackstuff wrote: ↑Wed Jul 27, 2022 7:14 am I'll be happy to be proven wrong about the jab in 5-10 years time.
I also work in the industry and I'm afraid your friend is talking utter crap... All the vaccines have been tested to every criteria required and in most cases have been tested even more rigorously than required.Geek wrote: ↑Wed Jul 27, 2022 8:03 pm
I know someone who is in the pharm industry and was involved in setting up covid testing labs - they have not had any of the vaccines or boosters. In their professional opinion, it doesn't meet the criteria for a vaccine.
I had the two initial vaccines (with hindsight, not sure I would have them given the choice again). Also had covid for the first time last week (felt ill and tired and wiped out for a day, then OK for a day, then tired for another day [tested positive for covid for three days, so didn't leave the house] then felt ok) and I will NOT be having any further covid vaccines or boosters. Each to their own choice as far as I am concerned. For comparison, my wife has had all covid current vaccines and boosters and has had covid twice (2020 and the week prior to me).
Oh there are all too many of those. There are many many pictures that flat earthers post of "flat" horizons with the caption "show me the curve". A particular hobby of mine is to take their own pictures, squeeze them laterally to accentuate the curve and then send it back to them with a big arrow pointing at the curve.Dark Skies wrote: ↑Wed Jul 27, 2022 8:37 pmIs that the one, where at some point, there's a shot at a flat earther holding forth against a horizon that is clearly curved?
As I said each to their own, however, I am sure more people are now refusing the boosters and I would expect that number to increase as more and more boosters are 'recommended'.
Wow, you know more about it than the guy that worked on it, impressive!Pippin89 wrote: ↑Thu Jul 28, 2022 7:27 amNo, its not.... it is being celebrated (well some of them) as being an mRNA vaccine which is a relatively "new" technology. "New" in this instance refers to the fact that it was first approved for use in the 90s. It was discovered in the 60s and has been rigorously tested for decades. The first full scale trial of mRNA vaccines was completed in 2015 as a replacement for the current flu jab. No one (except maybe the media and conspiracy nuts) is suggesting that this is a brand new and untested technology because that just isn't true.Blackstuff wrote: ↑Wed Jul 27, 2022 7:14 am The CV19 jab was, and still is touted as being brought about in an ENTIRELY new way
Testing the exact jab formula for a disease they didn't even know about until 4 years later, now THAT'S impressive. Was there an Emmett Brown on the team by any chance? Wild white hair, crazy eyes, drives a DeLorean?Blackstuff wrote: ↑Wed Jul 27, 2022 7:14 am I'll be happy to be proven wrong about the jab in 5-10 years time.
As above, the first human trial finished in 2015. 7 years ago. Consider yourself proven wrong.
Yes, yes of course oh Oracle. Now I said I wasn't going to come back to this but frankly after the above I feel i have to. Just one question jab Obi-Wan. How many people to date, or in the last recorded year have died FROM Covid with no comorbidities? (I'll not hammer the point home by asking for the age range breakdown as well.)Geek wrote: ↑Wed Jul 27, 2022 8:03 pm
I know someone who is in the pharm industry and was involved in setting up covid testing labs - they have not had any of the vaccines or boosters. In their professional opinion, it doesn't meet the criteria for a vaccine.
I had the two initial vaccines (with hindsight, not sure I would have them given the choice again). Also had covid for the first time last week (felt ill and tired and wiped out for a day, then OK for a day, then tired for another day [tested positive for covid for three days, so didn't leave the house] then felt ok) and I will NOT be having any further covid vaccines or boosters. Each to their own choice as far as I am concerned. For comparison, my wife has had all covid current vaccines and boosters and has had covid twice (2020 and the week prior to me).
I also work in the industry and I'm afraid your friend is talking utter crap... All the vaccines have been tested to every criteria required and in most cases have been tested even more rigorously than required.