Or go back a little further to Bentham - "it is the greatest happiness of the greatest number that is the measure of right and wrong"
Depending on your point of view this could mean:
One umbrella organisation to support all shooters but probably with a huge complexity and compromise. How would you ever reach consensus. Would it frighten or please society and the law makers? Weaken or strengthen shooters' lobby?
Several organisations to support each type of shooter in the best way for their discipline.
Ban all shooters if that makes the majority of society happy.
What do shooters want to achieve? What would society want? How do you best resolve any conflicts between the 2?
NATSS Single Body. £3/4M Sport England money. What happened?
Moderator: dromia
Forum rules
The National Body General Discussion section is exactly that, a section for all of us to discuss the National Bodies and what they are up to.
Please bear in mind that this is an open forum and your posts can be read by all members. If you are in a position that can be compromised by what you are saying on here because someone takes offense and tells your colleagues or your sponsor and that in turn means you are being punished for your posts on here, think before you post!
The National Body General Discussion section is exactly that, a section for all of us to discuss the National Bodies and what they are up to.
Please bear in mind that this is an open forum and your posts can be read by all members. If you are in a position that can be compromised by what you are saying on here because someone takes offense and tells your colleagues or your sponsor and that in turn means you are being punished for your posts on here, think before you post!
Who is online
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 1 guest