The UK's Finest Independent Forum for Shooters and Gun Owners. Est 2010.

Gh0st wrote:Sorry was that an answer as to why the Suffolk Rifles Glock wasn’t on the market now?

Ok, what ever, you just keep speculating away from your keyboard.

My apologies , I must have overlooked that .

Neal's 22lr pistol (that was not a Glock) is not on the market for a couple of simple reasons .

1. Neal lost his RFD .

2. Another RFD was prepared to take over the project , however as the exchange rate against the dollar plumeted it was clear to them that the possible retail price of the firearm was way over what shooters would be prepared to pay for it .

Sadly I cannot recall who the dealer was , but I know he spoke to a few other dealers at Phoenix a year or more ago , and at the time he was saying that the pistol would have to retail around the £1500.00 mark if there was to be any profit in it .

But there it is , Neals 22lr pistol is not on the market due to circumstances beyond his control .

Losing his RFD? Right... just so we have it clear.

Gh0st wrote:Losing his RFD? Right... just so we have it clear.

Losing is one way of putting it.

This thread is absolutely toxic, if it’s not troll wars over old threads it’s openly questioning the legality of an RFD’s actions, with absolutely no reliable information, on a permanently published public forum.

What’s more it’s an RFD who’s actively trying to bring something interesting to a restrictive, profitless and limited market as well.

Logout, phone a friend, have a hug, buy a beer.

<shakes head in disappointment......>

safetyfirst wrote:This thread is absolutely toxic, if it’s not troll wars over old threads it’s openly questioning the legality of an RFD’s actions, with absolutely no reliable information, on a permanently published public forum.

What’s more it’s an RFD who’s actively trying to bring something interesting to a restrictive, profitless and limited market as well.

Logout, phone a friend, have a hug, buy a beer.

<shakes head in disappointment......>

100% agreed. It does no one any favours.

I’ll take a cider over beer tho!

safetyfirst wrote:This thread is absolutely toxic, if it’s not troll wars over old threads it’s openly questioning the legality of an RFD’s actions, with absolutely no reliable information, on a permanently published public forum.

What’s more it’s an RFD who’s actively trying to bring something interesting to a restrictive, profitless and limited market as well.

Logout, phone a friend, have a hug, buy a beer.

<shakes head in disappointment......>

All the posts not related to the LBR in question should be deleted IMO.

Blackstuff wrote:

safetyfirst wrote:This thread is absolutely toxic, if it’s not troll wars over old threads it’s openly questioning the legality of an RFD’s actions, with absolutely no reliable information, on a permanently published public forum.

What’s more it’s an RFD who’s actively trying to bring something interesting to a restrictive, profitless and limited market as well.

Logout, phone a friend, have a hug, buy a beer.

<shakes head in disappointment......>

All the posts not related to the LBR in question should be deleted IMO.

Blackstuff wrote:

safetyfirst wrote:This thread is absolutely toxic, if it’s not troll wars over old threads it’s openly questioning the legality of an RFD’s actions, with absolutely no reliable information, on a permanently published public forum.

What’s more it’s an RFD who’s actively trying to bring something interesting to a restrictive, profitless and limited market as well.

Logout, phone a friend, have a hug, buy a beer.

<shakes head in disappointment......>

All the posts not related to the LBR in question should be deleted IMO.

Forums are there to discuss common interests. If you feel you need to lock the thread ( or delete posts )because it provokes conversation then I'm really not sure why the forum exists.

The coloured bit I have inserted , the rest was a comment by another member on another thread .

MistAgain wrote:

Blackstuff wrote:

safetyfirst wrote:This thread is absolutely toxic, if it’s not troll wars over old threads it’s openly questioning the legality of an RFD’s actions, with absolutely no reliable information, on a permanently published public forum.

What’s more it’s an RFD who’s actively trying to bring something interesting to a restrictive, profitless and limited market as well.

Logout, phone a friend, have a hug, buy a beer.

<shakes head in disappointment......>

All the posts not related to the LBR in question should be deleted IMO.

Forums are there to discuss common interests. If you feel you need to lock the thread ( or delete posts )because it provokes conversation then I'm really not sure why the forum exists.

The coloured bit I have inserted , the rest was a comment by another member on another thread .

Oh the irony...

stand by open discussion but not if people think it’s going to be detrimental to the sport.