BR99: non-standard rail?
Posted: Sat Mar 14, 2015 7:47 pm
I have been sorting out my BR-99. Got a new charging handle, a Yankee Hill Machine riser and a Burris Fast Fire III with the Flat top mount. These are the components:
http://yhm.net/scope-riser.html
http://www.opticsplanet.com/burris-ar-f ... mount.html
The Yankee Hill Machine is a good, precision riser. I have one already on my SIG522 which has a Picatinny rail integrated in the receiver just like the BR99. This riser is one piece of metal.
I have the Burris and the Flat Top mount currently mounted on that SIG522 whilst I wait for a second Burris Fast Fire III to arrive from Optics Planet.
I already have the second Yankee Hil Machine riser and I have checked it on the SIG522, it is an exact fit, just like its brother.
So...imagine my disappointment when I tried to put the Yankee Hill Machine Riser on my BR99 and it won't go on. It doesn't just slide on, as it will on the SIG. It can can be made to fit but it requires persuasion with a rubber mallet.
When the riser is on, the screws cannot be inserted because they contact the bottom surface of the groove in the rail on the BR99.
When I compare the BR99 rail with the Yankee Hill Machine Riser, the spacing of the grooves is identical, but the depth of the grooves is slightly shallower on the BR99 and also the overall width of the rail is slightly wider on the BR99.
I have also checked this with some Evo rail stock I have on hand, which is being used to make Picatinny rails for my crossbows. The Evo rails match the SIG and Yankee Hill, the BR99 is the odd duck out.
It looks like I have two options:
1) Abandon the Yankee Hill Machine riser and get one with a detachable side plate. I'm not that keen on this because the Yankee Hill Machine Riser is very strong, just the right height and looks good on the BR99.
2) Take a very small amount of metal out of the two grooves on the BR99 rail, so that the screws which tighten the riser can pass.
Does anybody else have this issue?
http://yhm.net/scope-riser.html
http://www.opticsplanet.com/burris-ar-f ... mount.html
The Yankee Hill Machine is a good, precision riser. I have one already on my SIG522 which has a Picatinny rail integrated in the receiver just like the BR99. This riser is one piece of metal.
I have the Burris and the Flat Top mount currently mounted on that SIG522 whilst I wait for a second Burris Fast Fire III to arrive from Optics Planet.
I already have the second Yankee Hil Machine riser and I have checked it on the SIG522, it is an exact fit, just like its brother.
So...imagine my disappointment when I tried to put the Yankee Hill Machine Riser on my BR99 and it won't go on. It doesn't just slide on, as it will on the SIG. It can can be made to fit but it requires persuasion with a rubber mallet.
When the riser is on, the screws cannot be inserted because they contact the bottom surface of the groove in the rail on the BR99.
When I compare the BR99 rail with the Yankee Hill Machine Riser, the spacing of the grooves is identical, but the depth of the grooves is slightly shallower on the BR99 and also the overall width of the rail is slightly wider on the BR99.
I have also checked this with some Evo rail stock I have on hand, which is being used to make Picatinny rails for my crossbows. The Evo rails match the SIG and Yankee Hill, the BR99 is the odd duck out.
It looks like I have two options:
1) Abandon the Yankee Hill Machine riser and get one with a detachable side plate. I'm not that keen on this because the Yankee Hill Machine Riser is very strong, just the right height and looks good on the BR99.
2) Take a very small amount of metal out of the two grooves on the BR99 rail, so that the screws which tighten the riser can pass.
Does anybody else have this issue?