LBR/LBP and "looking at it"?

24" and less, a place to discuss all things handgun related, section 7.3. Long barrelled revolvers, long barrelled pistols and section 5. Overseas contributions are more than welcome.

Moderator: dromia

Message
Author
User avatar
Sim G
Posts: 10745
Joined: Sat Nov 06, 2010 9:09 pm
Contact:

LBR/LBP and "looking at it"?

#1 Post by Sim G »

Right, just for curiosity when I should be doing other stuff....

LBR/LBP, Long Range Pistols and s1 Shotguns. We're aware that exemptions to needing a FAC to be in possession of a firearm, do not extend under the virtues of s15 FAA 1988, with regards to Home Office Approved Clubs, but what is the situation if someone wishes to "look at one" prior to purchase? Possession of firearms offences are strict liability so a "sorry, didn't know" won't cut it.

Now I was always of the opinion that s3(3) would cover that aspect. Being in possession of a valid FAC would give you the authority to "test" a gun as you can "acquire and possess", but after the "test" decide you don't wish to buy it, so hand it back to the vendor. Who would see a £1500 Benelli s1 12 gauge on the dealers shelf, hand over the money and have it put on their ticket before at least hefting it to their shoulder and checking out the controls?

How does it work for RFDs in regards to any s1 or s2 gun that a customer looks at? Am I missing something? I don't think I've ever been asked by an RFD to see either of my tickets prior to showing me something off their shelf....
3(3)It is an offence for a person to undertake the repair, test or proof of a firearm or ammunition to which section 1 of this Act applies, or of a shot gun, for any other person in the United Kingdom other than a registered firearms dealer as such, unless that other produces or causes to be produced a firearm certificate authorising him to have possession of the firearm or ammunition or, as the case may be, his shot gun certificate, or shows that he is by virtue of this Act entitled to have possession of it without holding a certificate.
In 1978 I was told by my grand dad that the secret to rifle accuracy is, a quality bullet, fired down a quality barrel..... How has that changed?

Guns dont kill people. Dads with pretty Daughters do...!
saddler

Re: LBR/LBP and "looking at it"?

#2 Post by saddler »

Like Section 5
.....no appropriate licence, no touchy....
User avatar
Sim G
Posts: 10745
Joined: Sat Nov 06, 2010 9:09 pm
Contact:

Re: LBR/LBP and "looking at it"?

#3 Post by Sim G »

By appropriate license do you mean a valid FAC with an open variation for that category of firearm? A valid FAC with that exact firearm entered on to it before you can even touch it? Or just a valid FAC?

And there are a number of exemptions to s5....
In 1978 I was told by my grand dad that the secret to rifle accuracy is, a quality bullet, fired down a quality barrel..... How has that changed?

Guns dont kill people. Dads with pretty Daughters do...!
saddler

Re: LBR/LBP and "looking at it"?

#4 Post by saddler »

FAC with open slot for same cal./type as being handled. Not shot, handled. ...

Not willing to risk it....even though I've not heard of any prosecution for this offence, no desire to be the first one!
So, erring on the side of caution. ...

The Westlake Club Carbine LBP was/is a good way around this mess of legislation.
User avatar
Sim G
Posts: 10745
Joined: Sat Nov 06, 2010 9:09 pm
Contact:

Re: LBR/LBP and "looking at it"?

#5 Post by Sim G »

So 3(3) of the 1968 Act applies?
In 1978 I was told by my grand dad that the secret to rifle accuracy is, a quality bullet, fired down a quality barrel..... How has that changed?

Guns dont kill people. Dads with pretty Daughters do...!
toffe wrapper
Posts: 580
Joined: Thu Mar 08, 2012 8:46 pm
Contact:

Re: LBR/LBP and "looking at it"?

#6 Post by toffe wrapper »

AFAIK
You cannot fire them but you can touch and look at them. If the owner is present they are in possession of it not you.
But your FEO is best placed to confirm.
User avatar
Sim G
Posts: 10745
Joined: Sat Nov 06, 2010 9:09 pm
Contact:

Re: LBR/LBP and "looking at it"?

#7 Post by Sim G »

No, unfortunately neither my FEO or the dept manager could confirm or deny..... They were even unaware of the exemptions under the FAA 1988.

And on the subject of such, saddlers FEO told him that they didn't comply with the Home Office Guidance because one aspect was a mistake and it will be taken out of the guidance when it's re-written!

The civilianising of the police was a great idea! 8-) :squirrel:
In 1978 I was told by my grand dad that the secret to rifle accuracy is, a quality bullet, fired down a quality barrel..... How has that changed?

Guns dont kill people. Dads with pretty Daughters do...!
User avatar
Sim G
Posts: 10745
Joined: Sat Nov 06, 2010 9:09 pm
Contact:

Re: LBR/LBP and "looking at it"?

#8 Post by Sim G »

No, s3 has nothing to do with it.

So, the question is, what legislation allows someone to have in their possession a LBR, long range pistol or s1 shotgun, whilst either examining or testing it prior to purchase...?
In 1978 I was told by my grand dad that the secret to rifle accuracy is, a quality bullet, fired down a quality barrel..... How has that changed?

Guns dont kill people. Dads with pretty Daughters do...!
User avatar
safetyfirst
Posts: 2651
Joined: Tue Nov 25, 2014 8:41 am
Contact:

Re: LBR/LBP and "looking at it"?

#9 Post by safetyfirst »

I've always been told you can't even touch them. Sigh.
IsleShoot

Re: LBR/LBP and "looking at it"?

#10 Post by IsleShoot »

My understanding of this was if you had a slot for an LBP/LBR on your ticket you could handle & shoot one as long as the owner was present.

Not to muddy the waters further but those clubs that have successfully won court battles to allow them to aquire & possess LBP's as club guns surely cast enough doubt on the current situation such that the HO guidance is mute?

That said I can completely understand why folk steer clear as its a horribly grey area and who wants to be the sap who is used as the test case, with the dynamic disciplines once again becoming ever more popular its never been more important for this question to be resolved.

I wonder if the Law Commission's codification project will help settle this one way or another?
Post Reply

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 0 guests