https://bayourenaissanceman.blogspot.co ... story.html
An Airco DH.9 bomber from World War I had been discovered in - of all places! - an elephant stable in India, and is being restored.
Moderator: dromia
An Airco DH.9 bomber from World War I had been discovered in - of all places! - an elephant stable in India, and is being restored.
I've got mixed feelings when it comes to so called restorations to flying condition. Unfortunately, so much of the original structure is replaced that it could almost be called a replica. I remember talking to one of the staff at the Shuttleworth Collection years ago, when they were thinking of making their De Havilland Comet airworthy and he was rattling off a list of all that would be binned. The entire fabic covering the aircraft for starters.GeeRam wrote:Actually two DH.9 were recovered from India by Guy Black, the one featured is E8894 which is being restored to flying condition, with the other one, D5649 is being restored to museum quality static for the Imperial War Museum, both are being restored by Retrotech down in Sussex.
The DH.9 that is being restored for the IWM was the more original of the two examples found, for that reason, the one being restored to flight was pretty much a collection of scrap parts and the all important identity - hence a perfect candidate to make airworthy.TomH wrote:I've got mixed feelings when it comes to so called restorations to flying condition. Unfortunately, so much of the original structure is replaced that it could almost be called a replica. I remember talking to one of the staff at the Shuttleworth Collection years ago, when they were thinking of making their De Havilland Comet airworthy and he was rattling off a list of all that would be binned. The entire fabic covering the aircraft for starters.GeeRam wrote:Actually two DH.9 were recovered from India by Guy Black, the one featured is E8894 which is being restored to flying condition, with the other one, D5649 is being restored to museum quality static for the Imperial War Museum, both are being restored by Retrotech down in Sussex.
Yes, you are right there. It's when only a small part is used to justify restoration that it gets blurred, as in the Spitfire "restored" on the Guy Martin programme. As long as the majority (by volume or weight) is intact that's OK. Good point about perishable/replacement components. I suppose;as an example, that say HMS Victory or Warrior would have replacement masts spars and rigging every few years. So we can never expect everything historic to be X years old.GeeRam wrote:The DH.9 that is being restored for the IWM was the more original of the two examples found, for that reason, the one being restored to flight was pretty much a collection of scrap parts and the all important identity - hence a perfect candidate to make airworthy.TomH wrote:I've got mixed feelings when it comes to so called restorations to flying condition. Unfortunately, so much of the original structure is replaced that it could almost be called a replica. I remember talking to one of the staff at the Shuttleworth Collection years ago, when they were thinking of making their De Havilland Comet airworthy and he was rattling off a list of all that would be binned. The entire fabic covering the aircraft for starters.GeeRam wrote:Actually two DH.9 were recovered from India by Guy Black, the one featured is E8894 which is being restored to flying condition, with the other one, D5649 is being restored to museum quality static for the Imperial War Museum, both are being restored by Retrotech down in Sussex.
In the case of the Comet you mention, it's been rebuilt/recovered/restored many times during its life anyway, in fact most fabric covered aircraft, by default/design will have been recovered during their service life as it's a time expired service item by design.
Indeed.TomH wrote: I suppose;as an example, that say HMS Victory or Warrior would have replacement masts spars and rigging every few years.
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 3 guests