Rogers and Spencer
Moderator: dromia
Rogers and Spencer
Hi
I was looking at the Euroarms Rogers and Spencer London Grey and the Uberti 1858 New Army Stainless Steel why is their such a bid difference in price? is the euroarms a lot better quality.
Cheers bally
I was looking at the Euroarms Rogers and Spencer London Grey and the Uberti 1858 New Army Stainless Steel why is their such a bid difference in price? is the euroarms a lot better quality.
Cheers bally
Re: Rogers and Spencer
Not at all, unless you're looking at the walther barrelled r&s. The r&s is a much better design though. It has a larger grip frame for a start. The rem is quite small and will give you a knuckle rap with anything approaching a decent charge. The r&s has much bigger nipple cut outs on the cylinder making it 10 times easier to get the caps on. It is much less prone to allowing spent caps into gaps and locking up the cylinder and finally the cylinder arbour is sealed much better on the r&s so you can shoot for much longer without stripping down for cleaning. I would quite happily pay more for an r&s than a rem. I've owned both models and I only have one of them now.
Re: Rogers and Spencer
Fred 2892.
Thanks for that post I'm' actually trying (very hard) to get hold of the R&S and even harder with adjustable sights. I have seen one converted to shoot Bullseye but I'm not sure if that would work. The write up says it need 14.2 grains of Bullseye behind a .44 ball which seems a lot.
Also Kranks told me Euroarms are not making the R&S any more so, they may command a higher price.
Anybody got ideas on the nitro conversion aspect?
Best
Jack
Thanks for that post I'm' actually trying (very hard) to get hold of the R&S and even harder with adjustable sights. I have seen one converted to shoot Bullseye but I'm not sure if that would work. The write up says it need 14.2 grains of Bullseye behind a .44 ball which seems a lot.
Also Kranks told me Euroarms are not making the R&S any more so, they may command a higher price.
Anybody got ideas on the nitro conversion aspect?
Best
Jack
Re: Rogers and Spencer
WoW! 14.2 grains of Bullseye does sound a lot I would double check that. My target load in my .357 pistol was 3.6 grains of Bullseye and the .44 Remington nitro conversion I was having a look at yesterday had a recommended load of 4.2 grains of Herco, slower than Bullseye but by too much.
Re: Rogers and Spencer
Yes, thanks for that 1066. My thoughts entirely. I'm now going for a Euroarms Rogers and Spencer traditional .44 and use triple 7 powder. I understand something like 11 grains. Anybody got suggestions on the load if so I appreciate them?
Thanks again
Best
Jack
Thanks again
Best
Jack
Re: Rogers and Spencer
This is the only one I have seen http://www.henrykrank.com/index.php?mai ... ts_id=7078 and the cost of the Uberti 1858 New Army Stainless Steel http://www.henrykrank.com/index.php?mai ... ts_id=7115 big price difference
Cheers Bally
Cheers Bally
Re: Rogers and Spencer
Hi Bally
Got an option on a R&S London Grey with target sights @ £450 ish. I thought the answer to comps would be a Lothar Walther barrel but, the way the standard shoots 11.2 grains of 777 that looks OK.
What I have seen are anatomical sights but can't hunt any down on the interweb. In the good old days we had Bowler grips but I don't suppose any of you guys would remember them. Only us old pharts and Jurassic handgunners.
Best
Jack
Got an option on a R&S London Grey with target sights @ £450 ish. I thought the answer to comps would be a Lothar Walther barrel but, the way the standard shoots 11.2 grains of 777 that looks OK.
What I have seen are anatomical sights but can't hunt any down on the interweb. In the good old days we had Bowler grips but I don't suppose any of you guys would remember them. Only us old pharts and Jurassic handgunners.
Best
Jack
- dromia
- Site Admin
- Posts: 20186
- Joined: Sat Nov 06, 2010 4:57 am
- Home club or Range: The Highlands of Scotland. Cycling Proficiency 1964. Felton & District rifle club. Teesdale Pistol and Rifle club.
- Location: Sutherland and Co Durham
- Contact:
Re: Rogers and Spencer
I still have the Bowlers from my Webley break barrel, single shot, 22 target pistol.
Come on Bambi get some
Imperial Good Metric Bad
Analogue Good Digital Bad
Fecking stones
Real farmers don't need subsidies
Cow's farts matter!
For fine firearms and requisites visit
http://www.pukkabundhooks.com/
Re: Rogers and Spencer
Thanks for that.fred2892 wrote:Not at all, unless you're looking at the walther barrelled r&s. The r&s is a much better design though. It has a larger grip frame for a start. The rem is quite small and will give you a knuckle rap with anything approaching a decent charge. The r&s has much bigger nipple cut outs on the cylinder making it 10 times easier to get the caps on. It is much less prone to allowing spent caps into gaps and locking up the cylinder and finally the cylinder arbour is sealed much better on the r&s so you can shoot for much longer without stripping down for cleaning. I would quite happily pay more for an r&s than a rem. I've owned both models and I only have one of them now.
Bally
Re: Rogers and Spencer
Just a thought if you are thinking about competitions. Using adjustable sight you may have to shoot in an "open" class rather than just BP revolver class.Jack 1 wrote:Hi Bally
Got an option on a R&S London Grey with target sights @ £450 ish. I thought the answer to comps would be a Lothar Walther barrel but, the way the standard shoots 11.2 grains of 777 that looks OK.
What I have seen are anatomical sights but can't hunt any down on the interweb. In the good old days we had Bowler grips but I don't suppose any of you guys would remember them. Only us old pharts and Jurassic handgunners.
Best
Jack
I had a nice Bowler grip on my S&W Mod 14 .38spec revolver.
Who is online
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 2 guests