I would 100% agree with and support a formal process for advising RFD's, club secretary's and similar of incidents and 'near misses' I am not aware of any such process for disseminating information regarding potential failures and more to the point when they are discussed in the public domain through mediums such as forums the information is vague at best. I inspect every single firearm that passes through my hands however I do not do have access to X-Ray or advanced crack detecting process and some of the older firearms I see have 100 years of grime and patina and the owner often does not want to see, nor pay for the the firearm to be scrupulously cleaned therefore I have to carry out the work and return the firearm 'As is'Maggot wrote:As an organisation, we dont do ourselves any favours.
We hear of the odd incident, but to date (as an RO) I have never had anything rammed down my throat in terms off accident/incident reports.
<snip>
This implies that they might have been avoided had actions been different. There are a lot less people shooting in the UK, so its mutch easier these days to disseminate info. This would cut out heresay, and introduce fact.
Perhaps a passworded ROs/RFDs portal on the website....when they get the current one smoothed out of course.
We have an 8x58RD Krag and a similar firearm was the subject of a recent incident and investigation ans as such has been banned from use at Bisley. Quite why does not appear to have been published so I have no views on the mode of failure or what to look for and right now I am not sure if such information will ever be fully revealed. The downside of this is if I had not read of the article somewhere I would not have known and could well have rocked up to a club shoot somewhere and taken a sizeable lump of my head off dspite this being a 'known' or at least reported issue.