
If carbon dioxide is so bad for the planet, why do greenhouse growers buy CO2 generators to double plant growth?
Learn more: http://www.naturalnews.com/040890_green ... z3xvElY2h8
Moderator: dromia
If all you care about is semantics and you fail to address the points in someone's argument. it's not possible.Explosive wrote:How is it possible to debate climate change, when the climate is always changing and always has done ?safetyfirst wrote:As far as I can tell, the overwhelming majority of steps people propose to tackle climate change have SO MANY other benefits that I don't give a hoot about the climate change debate.
The cheaper energy, improved air quality, better food, less pressured healthcare system and improved transport are enough for me.
Who cares about the climate change debate.
christel wrote:If Explosive wants to use the American anti global warming propaganda that is available online to discuss global warming then so be it. I know he is wrong and so do millions of other people globally which is why they are discussing it and trying to find solutions to the man-made damage that has been happening since the Industrial Revolution.
I am not even going to come up with examples, just looking out the window is enough...
Just to defend my mention of American anti global warming propaganda, the US has a huge stake in production globally, the country's consumption is staggering compared to the rest of the world.
Who could possibly be blamed ?Pete wrote:It's today's kids I feel sorry for...............we've done them no favours at all.
Too late to play the "blame game" now............
Pete