How is it not a good illustration? It is a visual comparison of the burn rate of two powders tested under the same circumstances? Please educate me how blackpowder burn rate does not change under compression yet the burn rate of smokeless powder does change under compression.
From my understanding modern smokeless powder contains chemicals designed to control the rate of burn.
Also, with the notion that smokeless powder has a different burn rate under contained pressure, why is there a requirement for storage of blackpowder but not for smokeless powder?
Black powder revolver wanted
Moderator: dromia
Forum rules
All groups are welcome to post unless your user name is in Newly Registered Red, your post will be removed.
No disparaging remarks, if you don't like what you see then don't buy it.
All groups are welcome to post unless your user name is in Newly Registered Red, your post will be removed.
No disparaging remarks, if you don't like what you see then don't buy it.
-
WelshShooter
- Full-Bore UK Supporter
- Posts: 1806
- Joined: Wed Jun 25, 2014 9:45 pm
- Contact:
-
dromia
- Site Admin
- Posts: 20087
- Joined: Sat Nov 06, 2010 4:57 am
- Home club or Range: The Highlands of Scotland. Cycling Proficiency 1964. Felton & District rifle club. Teesdale Pistol and Rifle club.
- Location: Sutherland and Co Durham
- Contact:
Re: Black powder revolver wanted
The requirement is because when smokeless is not contained it burns far slower than when contained as opposed to black powder which burns the same rate, fast, whether contained or not.
Apples and oranges.
Apples and oranges.
Come on Bambi get some
Imperial Good Metric Bad
Analogue Good Digital Bad
Fecking stones
Real farmers don't need subsidies
Cow's farts matter!
For fine firearms and requisites visit
http://www.pukkabundhooks.com/
Who is online
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 2 guests