You need to ask the NRA, or the person you deal with when you go there about that.G_C wrote: We haven't sent off the forms yet. We're currently probationary members of the NRA and will be shooting at Bisley. I believe you need to be a member of a club for a minimum of three months. If this time starts from initial probationary membership (11th Jan for us), not from when you receive the safe shooter certificate then given a six month delay I guess we could send them off now.
FAC timescales for Thames Valley?
Moderator: dromia
Re: FAC timescales for Thames Valley?
-
- Site Admin
- Posts: 17507
- Joined: Fri Nov 05, 2010 7:52 pm
- Location: Wind Swept Denmark
- Contact:
Re: FAC timescales for Thames Valley?
Don't ask for mirrored FACs, pain when one goes for a variation.
Ask for permission to keep eachother's firearms and ammo.
The wording is something like...
"Name" has permission to be in lawful possession of "name's" firearms.
Might have gotten that wrong
Anyway, ask for that, not mirrored.
If they say no...ask why not as other police forces are granting it. Beds/Lincs/Hampshire to name a few.
Ask for permission to keep eachother's firearms and ammo.
The wording is something like...
"Name" has permission to be in lawful possession of "name's" firearms.
Might have gotten that wrong
Anyway, ask for that, not mirrored.
If they say no...ask why not as other police forces are granting it. Beds/Lincs/Hampshire to name a few.
Re: FAC timescales for Thames Valley?
That's interesting. I didn't see any mention of that in the Home Office guide on licensing law. Will have to take another look.christel wrote:Don't ask for mirrored FACs, pain when one goes for a variation.
Ask for permission to keep eachother's firearms and ammo.
The wording is something like...
"Name" has permission to be in lawful possession of "name's" firearms.
Might have gotten that wrong
Anyway, ask for that, not mirrored.
If they say no...ask why not as other police forces are granting it. Beds/Lincs/Hampshire to name a few.
-
- Posts: 1422
- Joined: Tue Feb 22, 2011 12:43 pm
- Home club or Range: NRA Bisley
- Location: Bisley
- Contact:
Re: FAC timescales for Thames Valley?
Its not in the Guide, but it is completely legal, and as said, much easier than having the same guns on 2 FACs.G_C wrote:That's interesting. I didn't see any mention of that in the Home Office guide on licensing law. Will have to take another look.christel wrote:Don't ask for mirrored FACs, pain when one goes for a variation.
Ask for permission to keep eachother's firearms and ammo.
The wording is something like...
"Name" has permission to be in lawful possession of "name's" firearms.
Might have gotten that wrong
Anyway, ask for that, not mirrored.
If they say no...ask why not as other police forces are granting it. Beds/Lincs/Hampshire to name a few.
- kennyc
- Posts: 2340
- Joined: Wed Jul 20, 2011 11:21 pm
- Home club or Range: hunters NRPC
- Location: Reading West Berks
- Contact:
Re: FAC timescales for Thames Valley?
according to the Shooting Show, Thames Valley have called in BASC to help reduce the waiting time to 60 days, so it will be interesting to see what happens.
Re: FAC timescales for Thames Valley?
That's positive news. I wonder how long it will take to work through the backlog (rhetorical question). We'll likely be applying in May. 60 days is still long but doesn't seem ridiculous.kennyc wrote:according to the Shooting Show, Thames Valley have called in BASC to help reduce the waiting time to 60 days, so it will be interesting to see what happens.
- meles meles
- Posts: 6335
- Joined: Mon Jun 06, 2011 8:17 pm
- Home club or Range: HBSA
- Location: Underground
- Contact:
Re: FAC timescales for Thames Valley?
60 days is ridiculous.
You are paying for a service but not receiving it. As the service is there for the public good, not for your benefit, you shouldn't even need to pay for it.
The DVLA can keep track of 33 million drivers and 17 million private cars, issue a licence in under 10 working days and also cope with sending out taxation reminders, speeding fines and so forth at the same time.
The technical capability exists, the reason ("public good') exists, so why is the service so poor ?
You are paying for a service but not receiving it. As the service is there for the public good, not for your benefit, you shouldn't even need to pay for it.
The DVLA can keep track of 33 million drivers and 17 million private cars, issue a licence in under 10 working days and also cope with sending out taxation reminders, speeding fines and so forth at the same time.
The technical capability exists, the reason ("public good') exists, so why is the service so poor ?
Badger
CEO (Chief Excavatin' Officer)
Badger Korporashun
Quidquid latine dictum sit altum viditur.
"Quelle style, so British"
CEO (Chief Excavatin' Officer)
Badger Korporashun
Quidquid latine dictum sit altum viditur.
"Quelle style, so British"
- kennyc
- Posts: 2340
- Joined: Wed Jul 20, 2011 11:21 pm
- Home club or Range: hunters NRPC
- Location: Reading West Berks
- Contact:
Re: FAC timescales for Thames Valley?
60 days is around 300 less than they are currently taking ! so as an improvement its not too shabby, IF they can manage to attain itmeles meles wrote:60 days is ridiculous.
You are paying for a service but not receiving it. As the service is there for the public good, not for your benefit, you shouldn't even need to pay for it.
The DVLA can keep track of 33 million drivers and 17 million private cars, issue a licence in under 10 working days and also cope with sending out taxation reminders, speeding fines and so forth at the same time.
The technical capability exists, the reason ("public good') exists, so why is the service so poor ?
Re: FAC timescales for Thames Valley?
I understand the point you're making but don't think the comparison really holds true. DVLA isn't staffed or run by the police and neither is the granting of driving licences. Registration of cars doesn't require a home visit by the police nor the need to check two independent references or a GP comment (for most people).meles meles wrote:60 days is ridiculous.
You are paying for a service but not receiving it. As the service is there for the public good, not for your benefit, you shouldn't even need to pay for it.
The DVLA can keep track of 33 million drivers and 17 million private cars, issue a licence in under 10 working days and also cope with sending out taxation reminders, speeding fines and so forth at the same time.
The technical capability exists, the reason ("public good') exists, so why is the service so poor ?
In an ideal world I'd agree that 60 is too long but pragmatically, as kennyc says, 60 days from the current 180-360 is a vast improvement.
- shugie
- Posts: 1602
- Joined: Sun Apr 29, 2012 3:42 pm
- Home club or Range: Sperry at Bisley
- Location: near Reading
- Contact:
Re: FAC timescales for Thames Valley?
What can BASC do to help them I wonder?kennyc wrote:according to the Shooting Show, Thames Valley have called in BASC to help reduce the waiting time to 60 days, so it will be interesting to see what happens.
Careful now/that sort of thing
Who is online
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 0 guests