Pietta New Model Army Revolver - absurd trajectory issues.

Anything muzzle loading in here. Old and new, rifles, shotguns, pistols and even cannons!

Moderator: dromia

Message
Author
User avatar
bradaz11
Full-Bore UK Supporter
Posts: 4788
Joined: Mon Jun 02, 2014 1:23 am
Home club or Range: The tunnel at Charmouth, BWSS
Location: Bristol
Contact:

Re: Pietta New Model Army Revolver - absurd trajectory issue

#11 Post by bradaz11 »

do you have scales that you can weigh it with to just see roughly how much it is by weight?
When guns are outlawed, only Outlaws will have guns
User avatar
Dark Skies
Posts: 2856
Joined: Tue Apr 22, 2014 11:02 am
Home club or Range: NRA
Contact:

Re: Pietta New Model Army Revolver - absurd trajectory issue

#12 Post by Dark Skies »

bradaz11 wrote:do you have scales that you can weigh it with to just see roughly how much it is by weight?
Yes, it's 19.3 grains by weight.
"I don't like my job and I don't think I'm gonna go anymore."
User avatar
bradaz11
Full-Bore UK Supporter
Posts: 4788
Joined: Mon Jun 02, 2014 1:23 am
Home club or Range: The tunnel at Charmouth, BWSS
Location: Bristol
Contact:

Re: Pietta New Model Army Revolver - absurd trajectory issue

#13 Post by bradaz11 »

according to this

http://www.curtrich.com/BPConversionSheet.htm

if I'm reading it right, 30gr by vol should be 24gr by mass
When guns are outlawed, only Outlaws will have guns
User avatar
Dark Skies
Posts: 2856
Joined: Tue Apr 22, 2014 11:02 am
Home club or Range: NRA
Contact:

Re: Pietta New Model Army Revolver - absurd trajectory issue

#14 Post by Dark Skies »

bradaz11 wrote:according to this

http://www.curtrich.com/BPConversionSheet.htm

if I'm reading it right, 30gr by vol should be 24gr by mass
That's quite a difference.
Perhaps I'm filling the measure incorrectly. I ladle powder into the pre-set measuring tube and slice it level with a lino knife blade.
I have noticed that if I give the measure a tap on my bench the level will fall and I could get more in.

I'll try that and see if I can get a by weight measure that's close to the chart.

Did that. 20.7 grains by weight.
"I don't like my job and I don't think I'm gonna go anymore."
User avatar
bradaz11
Full-Bore UK Supporter
Posts: 4788
Joined: Mon Jun 02, 2014 1:23 am
Home club or Range: The tunnel at Charmouth, BWSS
Location: Bristol
Contact:

Re: Pietta New Model Army Revolver - absurd trajectory issue

#15 Post by bradaz11 »

well it could also be an old chart, and not current to the current formulation of powder.

but it does sound like you really aren't getting much in.

I use BP and I use a spout on a flask, its just spin it over with finger on end, thumb opens the valve, three flicks on the valve, back right way up, drag finger over opening to flick off any stuck to me, then pour in chamber.
When guns are outlawed, only Outlaws will have guns
User avatar
channel12
Posts: 1005
Joined: Tue Feb 05, 2013 11:30 pm
Home club or Range: WNSC
Location: Worcestershire
Contact:

Re: Pietta New Model Army Revolver - absurd trajectory issue

#16 Post by channel12 »

A quick tip, if you have filled the chamber with powder and you can't fully seat the ball, it's too much powder. lol

It sounds like you didn't have enough powder, the problem with going by volume is that it can settle. I always weigh out my charges and dispense in to phials to load at the range.
User avatar
Dark Skies
Posts: 2856
Joined: Tue Apr 22, 2014 11:02 am
Home club or Range: NRA
Contact:

Re: Pietta New Model Army Revolver - absurd trajectory issue

#17 Post by Dark Skies »

channel12 wrote:A quick tip, if you have filled the chamber with powder and you can't fully seat the ball, it's too much powder. lol

It sounds like you didn't have enough powder, the problem with going by volume is that it can settle. I always weigh out my charges and dispense in to phials to load at the range.
Once you have filled with charge, placed a wad on top, and then rammed a ball down on top what's the gap twixt top of ball and front of chamber?
"I don't like my job and I don't think I'm gonna go anymore."
User avatar
Sim G
Posts: 10752
Joined: Sat Nov 06, 2010 9:09 pm
Contact:

Re: Pietta New Model Army Revolver - absurd trajectory issue

#18 Post by Sim G »

I think there's an awful lot of getting in front of the issue here....

First question, when aiming ridiculously high to hit the target, what sort of groups are you actually getting?

And I will chuck in at this stage, if you can use Triple 7, why not Pyrodex? I understand that some indoor ranges don't allow BP and only the substitutes, but seems odd that one of the substitutes is also excluded...

But we'll not muddy yet. What's the group size?
In 1978 I was told by my grand dad that the secret to rifle accuracy is, a quality bullet, fired down a quality barrel..... How has that changed?

Guns dont kill people. Dads with pretty Daughters do...!
User avatar
MrD
Full-Bore UK Supporter
Posts: 274
Joined: Wed Jan 18, 2012 10:47 pm
Location: Forres, Moray
Contact:

Re: Pietta New Model Army Revolver - absurd trajectory issue

#19 Post by MrD »

We use 15gn Pyrodex P, 10mm thick felt wad and a .454 Shellhouse ball in our club Pietta 1858 and it shoots fine at 25yds. Other members with the 1858 use similar power loads using Pyordex P, BP or Triple7 and a variety of wads/fillers with the same results. If your revolver is giving such a strange trajectory then I feel that perhaps the problem is the revolver rather than your load, unless there is something wrong with your tub of powder.
Is there another member who would let you try some of their powder to see if that improves things?

Donald
Save it for a mammal who cares!

http://www.cawdorrifleandgunclub.co.uk/
User avatar
MrD
Full-Bore UK Supporter
Posts: 274
Joined: Wed Jan 18, 2012 10:47 pm
Location: Forres, Moray
Contact:

Re: Pietta New Model Army Revolver - absurd trajectory issue

#20 Post by MrD »

Further to my last, I noticed you said you used the same powder in your .36 and it had worked. So, for fun I dug out the club 1858 and loaded it with 30gn (by vol) of Pyrodex P. I rammed a .454 ball a bit harder than I would normally do without any wad, and I would doubt that I could fit another ball in without it fouling on the cone, let alone a ball and a half.

Donald
Save it for a mammal who cares!

http://www.cawdorrifleandgunclub.co.uk/
Post Reply

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 3 guests