Lantac CMMG's

For everything AR15 related and the ultimate in side charging or semi auto 22 rifles. http://www.lan-tac.com
Huge selection of accessories and upgrades, all available online. We are the UK distributor for LaRue Tactical & Battle Arms Developments.
Message
Author
User avatar
shugie
Posts: 1602
Joined: Sun Apr 29, 2012 3:42 pm
Home club or Range: Sperry at Bisley
Location: near Reading
Contact:

Re: Lantac CMMG's

#181 Post by shugie »

I can't claim to have put that many rounds through mine, but so far I've been very pleased with it, the short barrel seems very accurate and makes a very compact and lightweight gallery rifle. The only thing I plan to change is the buttstock so I can have a cheek rise of some sort. I've been using SK standard plus, but might try some CCIs, as long as my K22 is happy with them, don't really want 2 makes.
Careful now/that sort of thing
Gazza

Re: Lantac CMMG's

#182 Post by Gazza »

Rarms wrote:
Gazza wrote:The rifle actually shoots better without the follower
In what way?
Most noticable is the "boing" from the buffer tube spring has gone when cycling the next round. I doubt this is making groups better as the recoil seems more now.
The accuracy has got better but this could be coinciding with the change to CCI standards.
Finally when the bolt carrier group is removed the follower does not fall on the floor! :D

Best thing is to try it without and see what you think. :good:
User avatar
BamBam
Posts: 2695
Joined: Thu Dec 19, 2013 5:23 pm
Location: Royston vasey
Contact:

Re: Lantac CMMG's

#183 Post by BamBam »

I've had 2 CMMG rifles and I ditched the forward assist insert on both. It cycles much smoother without the insert IMO.
Image
Gazza

Re: Lantac CMMG's

#184 Post by Gazza »

BamBam wrote: It cycles much smoother without the insert IMO.
Thats what I should have said :good:
Gh0st

Re: Lantac CMMG's

#185 Post by Gh0st »

BamBam wrote:
Gh0st wrote:Just out of interest, has anyone received their Lantac CMMG. Be interested to hear some feedback on performance. Particularly reliability.

Why not read here and draw your own conclusions.
I already read all 18 pages after finding this thread in the search function. Thanks though.

Keen to understand people's response after their initial impressions/ ownership.
User avatar
safetyfirst
Posts: 2651
Joined: Tue Nov 25, 2014 8:41 am
Contact:

Re: Lantac CMMG's

#186 Post by safetyfirst »

As an aside I found you can ditch the carrier return spring, that reduces twang!
User avatar
shugie
Posts: 1602
Joined: Sun Apr 29, 2012 3:42 pm
Home club or Range: Sperry at Bisley
Location: near Reading
Contact:

Re: Lantac CMMG's

#187 Post by shugie »

safetyfirst wrote:As an aside I found you can ditch the carrier return spring, that reduces twang!
At the risk of displaying risible ignorance, which spring is that, the one in the buffer tube, or the one in the stainless assembly that can be removed for cleaning?
Careful now/that sort of thing
Rarms
Posts: 432
Joined: Wed Aug 01, 2012 1:52 pm
Contact:

Re: Lantac CMMG's

#188 Post by Rarms »

The buffer tube spring and buffer can be removed from a .22
User avatar
safetyfirst
Posts: 2651
Joined: Tue Nov 25, 2014 8:41 am
Contact:

Re: Lantac CMMG's

#189 Post by safetyfirst »

Thanks rarms. Knew it had a proper name. I’ve run without mine for over a year now. Took it out when I fitted an HK416c stock to it.
User avatar
Dellboy
Full-Bore UK Supporter
Posts: 2630
Joined: Wed Aug 31, 2011 11:49 am
Home club or Range: Star Shooting Club
Location: Essex
Contact:

Re: Lantac CMMG's

#190 Post by Dellboy »

Looks like the June batch are in ........
2020 GOOD DEALS WITH

Cutch Vortex Scope
Mauserbill Enfield Books


Enjoy today as tomorrow might not come .

Noli pati a scelestis opprimi.

002515
Post Reply

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 0 guests