Re: The Imperial
Posted: Mon Jul 23, 2012 5:46 pm
Dittoovenpaa wrote:Nice one Heather :goodjob:
All people seeking membership must contact admin after registering to be validated.
https://mail.full-bore.co.uk/
Dittoovenpaa wrote:Nice one Heather :goodjob:
All threetargetman wrote: Better shooters, better rifles, or better ammunition ?
Interesting thought. I don't think that humans have got inherently 'better' (or more determined, harder training etc. etc.). Here’s a graph of the winning scores. If I knew the relevant dates I could overlay things like target dimension changes, changes of ammo (RUAG from 2009?), the switch from SR(A/B) etc.targetman wrote:I then compared this with the scores in 1970.....winning score 281. (No4 Envoy and RG)
Better shooters, better rifles, or better ammunition ?
Now that would be an interesting diagram!rox wrote:
If I knew the relevant dates I could overlay things like target dimension changes, changes of ammo (RUAG from 2009?), the switch from SR(A/B) etc.
Send him a link and get him involved!HeatherW762 wrote:Reply from John about his rifle reads:
'Heather
I used a Swing action with a Bartlein barrel (30” 1 in 13 twist 5R).
Can’t imagine who would be interested, however there you are!
Regards
John'
Heather
Absolutely - any tips from the best are very welcome. The last time I had a go at the Queens (long time ago), I got counted out on a 102, so just getting to the next round would make me happy...and to get to the final would cross one off my 'bucket list'...TattooedGun wrote:HeatherW762 wrote:Reply from John about his rifle reads:
'Heather
I used a Swing action with a Bartlein barrel (30” 1 in 13 twist 5R).
Can’t imagine who would be interested, however there you are!
Regards
John'
Heather
Send him a link and get him involved!
I could use any advice he has to offer to help achieve winning the Queens