Incorrect info on .gov website
Moderator: dromia
Incorrect info on .gov website
Just having a poke about and found the following at: https://www.gov.uk/shotgun-and-firearm- ... mmunition.
"A shotgun certificate will not be given or renewed if the chief officer of police has a reason that you should not be allowed to have a shotgun under the Firearms Act. Or if they do not think you have a good reason to have, buy or acquire a shotgun." (my bold underlining).
Oops.
"A shotgun certificate will not be given or renewed if the chief officer of police has a reason that you should not be allowed to have a shotgun under the Firearms Act. Or if they do not think you have a good reason to have, buy or acquire a shotgun." (my bold underlining).
Oops.
- bradaz11
- Full-Bore UK Supporter
- Posts: 4778
- Joined: Mon Jun 02, 2014 1:23 am
- Home club or Range: The tunnel at Charmouth, BWSS
- Location: Bristol
- Contact:
Re: Incorrect info on .gov website
whats wrong with that?
"if they do not think you have a good reason to have, buy or acquire a shotgun"
"if they do not think you have a good reason to have, buy or acquire a shotgun"
When guns are outlawed, only Outlaws will have guns
Re: Incorrect info on .gov website
You don't need one
- Pete
- Full-Bore UK Supporter
- Posts: 3064
- Joined: Tue Sep 15, 2015 8:48 am
- Home club or Range: NRA Bisley
- Contact:
Re: Incorrect info on .gov website
Surely the chief officer of police can take whatever immediate action he/she feels is necessary in a given situation.......(and argue the legality of it later?).
Pete
Pete
"Tantum religio potuit suadere malorum" Lucretius
You're offended? Please explain why your inability to control your emotions translates into me having to censor my opinions....
You're offended? Please explain why your inability to control your emotions translates into me having to censor my opinions....
Re: Incorrect info on .gov website
If they have a specific reason (including a 'suspicion' of unsuitability) to remove a shotgun from a SGC holder or to refuse a grant or renewal then absolutely; we all wish Devon & Cornwall had done their job properly and stopped the Plymouth murders before they had even happened.
But for granting or renewing a SGC which the .gov website is referring to, there is no requirement to provide a reason for your SGC application - the form doesn't even give you an option to put one if you wanted to, unlike an FAC which requires a 'reason' for each slot.
- Blackstuff
- Full-Bore UK Supporter
- Posts: 7820
- Joined: Sun Nov 07, 2010 1:01 pm
- Contact:
Re: Incorrect info on .gov website
Probably just seeding the lie now and will build and expand into other documentation later. Once the new batch of FEO's start coming through following that they'll start quoting it verbatim and pointing a finger at the 'official info', or maybe i'm just cynical
DVC
-
- Posts: 54
- Joined: Sat Sep 17, 2022 8:22 am
- Home club or Range: Tavistock Miniature rifle club
- Contact:
Re: Incorrect info on .gov website
While I think the present gun laws are strict enough - if they are enforced properly, but if the Home office does decide to make 'Good reason' for owning a shotgun, would it really be much of a problem - or for that matter if they insisted on having two referees? All the applicant has to do is write down 'clay pigeon' or 'game shooting' in order to get it. What they might do is clamp down on the number of guns a person can own which would be a pain in the a..., but there again if someone has a good reason to own numerous guns it would be up to the Chief Constable to prove his reasons for refusing the application.
- dromia
- Site Admin
- Posts: 20186
- Joined: Sat Nov 06, 2010 4:57 am
- Home club or Range: The Highlands of Scotland. Cycling Proficiency 1964. Felton & District rifle club. Teesdale Pistol and Rifle club.
- Location: Sutherland and Co Durham
- Contact:
Re: Incorrect info on .gov website
You still seem to be conflating the law as writ and currently defined by issues determined 'pon in court and peoples (Police, gun clubs, internet firearms experts or not etc.etc.) opinions on the subject informed or otherwise.
This approach looses the whole foundation of the rule of law it gives the power of interpretation of the same to all and sundry with the plethoric confusion and uncertainty this creates.
It is an issue of principle and once that principle is lost then the rule of law becomes meaningless.
Just because a Chief constables opinion and actions on same don't impinge now but still are a subjective interpretation of the law then they should be resisted so as to maintain the principle otherwise we end up with the absurd mess we have now.
After reading the recent threads on this here gun owners and clubs seem to be as bad as plod for making things up on opinion which in no time seems to be accepted custom and practice and takes us yet another step away from what the law says and allows legal firearms owners to do and not to do.
With a community like ours no wonder shooting is damned and doomed!
This approach looses the whole foundation of the rule of law it gives the power of interpretation of the same to all and sundry with the plethoric confusion and uncertainty this creates.
It is an issue of principle and once that principle is lost then the rule of law becomes meaningless.
Just because a Chief constables opinion and actions on same don't impinge now but still are a subjective interpretation of the law then they should be resisted so as to maintain the principle otherwise we end up with the absurd mess we have now.
After reading the recent threads on this here gun owners and clubs seem to be as bad as plod for making things up on opinion which in no time seems to be accepted custom and practice and takes us yet another step away from what the law says and allows legal firearms owners to do and not to do.
With a community like ours no wonder shooting is damned and doomed!
Come on Bambi get some
Imperial Good Metric Bad
Analogue Good Digital Bad
Fecking stones
Real farmers don't need subsidies
Cow's farts matter!
For fine firearms and requisites visit
http://www.pukkabundhooks.com/
Re: Incorrect info on .gov website
This 100%.
Read my post on my guns being seized based on the local FEOs 'interpretation' of the:
- Any other mental or physical condition which might affect your safe possession of firearms
or shotgun
if it's not law, it's not law.
Re: Incorrect info on .gov website
Just yesterday a chap showed me a letter from Kent police suggesting he should keep a cartridge case from each of his rifles, to help them identify the gun if it were stolen or used in a crime. The cases should be kept in a sealed bag and updated if any work was carried out on the rifle. I've heard they tried to implement this idea in Manchester but didn't realise it was creeping.
Also yesterday, had a little to and fro chat with with a chap saying it was a requirement to keep the bolt secured separately from the rifle. He couldn't really explain how that idea works with a semi-auto.
Also yesterday, had a little to and fro chat with with a chap saying it was a requirement to keep the bolt secured separately from the rifle. He couldn't really explain how that idea works with a semi-auto.
Who is online
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 1 guest