Vhitavuori N-120

This section is for reloading and ammunition only, all loads found in here are used strictly at your own risk, if in doubt ask again.
All handloading data posted on Full-Bore UK from 23/2/2021 must reference the published pressure tested data it was sourced from, posts without such verification will be removed.
Any existing data without such a reference should treated as suspect and not used.

Moderator: dromia

Forum rules
All handloading data posted on Full-Bore UK from 23/2/2021 must reference the published pressure tested data it was sourced from, posts without such verification will be removed.
Any existing data without such a reference should be treated as suspect and not used.

Use reloading information posted here at your own risk. This forum (http://www.full-bore.co.uk) is not responsible for any property damage or personal injury as a consequence of using reloading data posted here, the information is individual members findings and observations only. Always verify the load data and be absolutely sure your firearm can handle the load, especially older ones. If in doubt start low and work your way up.
Post Reply
Message
Author
User avatar
drone
Posts: 98
Joined: Wed Jan 04, 2023 4:11 pm
Contact:

Vhitavuori N-120

#1 Post by drone »

I bought a Kg of this as it seems to be similar (in burn rate) to Rl7 which is all but unobtainable.
I intended it for use in cast loads for both 30/30 and 308 but some advice I've been given says it gives significantly higher pressures than Rl7.
I have a whole range of cast boolits going from 120 rrn gc, 150 grain powder coated, 165 grain gc and 175 grain gc and wonder if anyone has any experience, good or bad to top up the blanks in my memory.
User avatar
drone
Posts: 98
Joined: Wed Jan 04, 2023 4:11 pm
Contact:

Re: Vhitavuori N-120

#2 Post by drone »

FWIW I have some lapua123 grn fmj which Vhita give a load for but I have some N-133 coming for that bullet and also have significantly more n-140 and n-150 amongst others that will give reasonable velocity without worrying me unduly but I have planned other uses for them. I'm also not a speed freak as most of my plinking is at 100 yards and less.
User avatar
dromia
Site Admin
Posts: 20186
Joined: Sat Nov 06, 2010 4:57 am
Home club or Range: The Highlands of Scotland. Cycling Proficiency 1964. Felton & District rifle club. Teesdale Pistol and Rifle club.
Location: Sutherland and Co Durham
Contact:

Re: Vhitavuori N-120

#3 Post by dromia »

Image

Come on Bambi get some

Imperial Good Metric Bad
Analogue Good Digital Bad

Fecking stones

Real farmers don't need subsidies

Cow's farts matter!

For fine firearms and requisites visit

http://www.pukkabundhooks.com/
User avatar
dromia
Site Admin
Posts: 20186
Joined: Sat Nov 06, 2010 4:57 am
Home club or Range: The Highlands of Scotland. Cycling Proficiency 1964. Felton & District rifle club. Teesdale Pistol and Rifle club.
Location: Sutherland and Co Durham
Contact:

Re: Vhitavuori N-120

#4 Post by dromia »

Pressure depends on the load regardless of powder.

You cannot use data for one powder with another powder no matter how close they may appear in burning rate charts.

However burning rate comparison can be helpful in giving a starting point for working up a safe load.

A read of this should be helpful in working up loads safely.


https://www.full-bore.co.uk/viewtopic.php?t=8480
Image

Come on Bambi get some

Imperial Good Metric Bad
Analogue Good Digital Bad

Fecking stones

Real farmers don't need subsidies

Cow's farts matter!

For fine firearms and requisites visit

http://www.pukkabundhooks.com/
User avatar
Mauserbill
Full-Bore UK Supporter
Posts: 1169
Joined: Thu Jun 22, 2017 4:49 pm
Home club or Range: Range
Contact:

Re: Vhitavuori N-120

#5 Post by Mauserbill »

Hello
Thanks Dromia, excellent information, keep it coming shooters, just had an outing with Schmidt Rubin K31 147grn FMJ at 100m starting point using N110. All good very accurate cases/primers showing no over pressure signs a very pleasant loading in fact. "Vit N110 was a very clean burning powder" seems to be very similar to 2400 in its characteristics.
User avatar
drone
Posts: 98
Joined: Wed Jan 04, 2023 4:11 pm
Contact:

Re: Vhitavuori N-120

#6 Post by drone »

Dromia, many thanks for that, I used Harris's article as a base for my experimentation with cast and low velocity loads in both my 308 and 30/30 without any issues until I got magtech LR primers then the shtf and they started top hatting which had a fairly high pucker factor I switched back to S&B lr and there was no issue .
When I looked at the 308 brass, they were GGG match 7.62 with a circular crimps that I'd probably (like definitely) removed too much brass and giving the primer cup somewhere to flow. 30/30 were a mix but not so badly affected ie visible with a magnifying glass but not, as the 308s, to the naked eye.
I subsequently found that magtech would deform with light loads of regular powders and jacketed or mono bullets in these cases but not in my other cases eg Federal and GSL. I bought a 100 308 peterson srp cases and they are now fine and I've sorted all my cases and retained the GSL and Peterson brass but scrapped the rest, some because they had multiple loads through them and the GGG so that I don't have to worry about them. I've upgraded my 30/30 brass all to either winchester, hornady or federal ( I had quite a cache of factory ammo and got gifted 100 winchester new brass)
Back to the original point I was raising re n-120. I noticed one of your posts referred to the length of time that you'd used both n110 and n120 for cast loads in military calibers and this piqued my interest.

I'm looking to get between 1800 and 2000 fps as all the boolits are about 20 - 22 BHN with gas checks except the 150s which are powder coated.
If, after next weekend, I still have my eyes and fingers I'll post up how things went.
FWIW, I didn't dump the 30/30 brass, I just annealed them and necked them down to 22 savage for my model 1899.
User avatar
dromia
Site Admin
Posts: 20186
Joined: Sat Nov 06, 2010 4:57 am
Home club or Range: The Highlands of Scotland. Cycling Proficiency 1964. Felton & District rifle club. Teesdale Pistol and Rifle club.
Location: Sutherland and Co Durham
Contact:

Re: Vhitavuori N-120

#7 Post by dromia »

Please give your pressure tested printed data sources for these loads.

Self developed loads without data are not allowed, what works for you may not work for someone else.


https://www.full-bore.co.uk/viewtopic.php?t=39540
Image

Come on Bambi get some

Imperial Good Metric Bad
Analogue Good Digital Bad

Fecking stones

Real farmers don't need subsidies

Cow's farts matter!

For fine firearms and requisites visit

http://www.pukkabundhooks.com/
User avatar
dromia
Site Admin
Posts: 20186
Joined: Sat Nov 06, 2010 4:57 am
Home club or Range: The Highlands of Scotland. Cycling Proficiency 1964. Felton & District rifle club. Teesdale Pistol and Rifle club.
Location: Sutherland and Co Durham
Contact:

Re: Vhitavuori N-120

#8 Post by dromia »

drone wrote: Sun Sep 01, 2024 9:23 pm Dromia, many thanks for that, I used Harris's article as a base for my experimentation with cast and low velocity loads in both my 308 and 30/30 without any issues until I got magtech LR primers then the shtf and they started top hatting which had a fairly high pucker factor I switched back to S&B lr and there was no issue .
When I looked at the 308 brass, they were GGG match 7.62 with a circular crimps that I'd probably (like definitely) removed too much brass and giving the primer cup somewhere to flow. 30/30 were a mix but not so badly affected ie visible with a magnifying glass but not, as the 308s, to the naked eye.
I subsequently found that magtech would deform with light loads of regular powders and jacketed or mono bullets in these cases but not in my other cases eg Federal and GSL. I bought a 100 308 peterson srp cases and they are now fine and I've sorted all my cases and retained the GSL and Peterson brass but scrapped the rest, some because they had multiple loads through them and the GGG so that I don't have to worry about them. I've upgraded my 30/30 brass all to either winchester, hornady or federal ( I had quite a cache of factory ammo and got gifted 100 winchester new brass)
Back to the original point I was raising re n-110. I noticed one of your posts referred to the length of time that you'd used both n110 and n120 for cast loads in military calibers and this piqued my interest.

I'm looking to get between 1800 and 2000 fps as all the boolits are about 20 - 22 BHN with gas checks except the 150s which are powder coated.
If, after next weekend, I still have my eyes and fingers I'll post up how things went.
FWIW, I didn't dump the 30/30 brass, I just annealed them and necked them down to 22 savage for my model 1899.
Firstly Those loads (removed as no printed pressure tested data source provided) seems very high from my experience, I have never gone so high and especially with N110.

I would not rely on pressure predictors especially with the to be honest nigh on over the top loads you are proposing.

Secondly 20-22 BHN is far to hard and brittle for cast bullets unless you have perfect bullet fit, also I find gas checks unnecessary for such middling velocities.
Image

Come on Bambi get some

Imperial Good Metric Bad
Analogue Good Digital Bad

Fecking stones

Real farmers don't need subsidies

Cow's farts matter!

For fine firearms and requisites visit

http://www.pukkabundhooks.com/
User avatar
drone
Posts: 98
Joined: Wed Jan 04, 2023 4:11 pm
Contact:

Re: Vhitavuori N-120

#9 Post by drone »

Thanks for the heads up, I have to be honest, I'm having a rethink as I have a large number of 308 cal bullets that I'll use up before going back down this rabbit hole.The only problem is that they are all various, couple of 100 tsx, 100 or so 180 sp and about 100 smks in 168 grn.
I have enough n140 and n150 to load all those and the old vhitavuori website also has some published loads for 30/30 using 130 and 150 grn bullets using the n120 so I can use that there.
Thanks to all for interest and comments.
FWIW I use https://www.p-max.uk/ a free predictor and I post it with the following caveat, measure the powder space accurately FOR EACH BULLET you load also for each brand of case, using the methodology highlighted in the instructions. I have found that such data matches Vhitavuori's data within 1% of the velocity in my experience.
As my magnetospeed rarely coincides with Vhit data by anything up to 4 or 5% I assess the outcome as a very good approximation. but it is just that, an approximation.
Post Reply

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 3 guests