Forum rules
Please remember to respect the copyright of the author. Please do not post content from this section elsewhere without the specific permission of the author.
Just curious. If those wonderful planes can be found and restored, who owns them today in 2012?
By the way, as a novice WW II aircraft historian and a huge fan of the American P-51, I believe the British Spitfire was the best all around aircraft fighter of WW II. What would have happened during the Battle of Britain without the "spit"?
Hmmm... I am a huge fan of the Spitfire as well, a truly iconic fighter however what would have happened during the Battle of Britain without the "Hurricane"?
/d
Du lytter aldrig til de ord jeg siger. Du ser mig kun for det tøj jeg har paa ...
ovenpaa wrote:Hmmm... I am a huge fan of the Spitfire as well, a truly iconic fighter however what would have happened during the Battle of Britain without the "Hurricane"?
....and more enemy aircraft were shot down in the Battle of Britain by ground Ack-Ack than either of the two named planes - good as they are/were
ovenpaa wrote:Hmmm... I am a huge fan of the Spitfire as well, a truly iconic fighter however what would have happened during the Battle of Britain without the "Hurricane"?
....and more enemy aircraft were shot down in the Battle of Britain by ground Ack-Ack than either of the two named planes - good as they are/were
On 1 August RAF Fighter Command strength stood at 570 Hurricanes and Spitfires (two- thirds of these were Hurricanes), and of the total only 367 were operational. Thus, excluding the less capable types, Blenheims, Defiants, Gladiators, and so forth, the German Me109s outnumbered the British forces by almost two to one (367 versus 702). British defenses also included some 1,200 heavy and 650 light antiaircraft pieces. And, although the Germans considered these insufficient for the defensive task, antiaircraft fire would account for about 12 percent of the German losses in the coming battles.
“The standard you walk past is the standard you accept.”